Steve Carroll
2008-09-08 23:41:27 UTC
...
they
are
republicans, but on if they're actually bad parents or not.
Sure: the Spears' were bad parents as shown by their teen getting
pregnant...
Wrong... the Spears were bad parents because they exhibited badYes - which parents it is makes a difference... if the parents
are
not
tied
to people running as a Republican they are *bad* parents...
otherwise
their
kids just made a "mistake" and it is OK. That is the hypocrisy
being
pointed out. For you to "disagree" by saying that the
specifics
of
who
the
parents are matters is silly - that is the point I am making: it
matters...
but what it "matters" on is clearly politically motivated.
no, whether they are bad parents or not depends not on whetherare
not
tied
to people running as a Republican they are *bad* parents...
otherwise
their
kids just made a "mistake" and it is OK. That is the hypocrisy
being
pointed out. For you to "disagree" by saying that the
specifics
of
who
the
parents are matters is silly - that is the point I am making: it
matters...
but what it "matters" on is clearly politically motivated.
they
are
republicans, but on if they're actually bad parents or not.
pregnant...
parenting
skills. You can't turn the Spears into as good a set of parents
(comparatively
speaking) as the Palins by taking one issue like this and yanking
it
parents
feel
free
to make your case... but you won't make it with me by addressing one
issue.
bitter
divorce battle themselves, Spears didn't graduate from high school and
she
has
some serious drug/alcohol problems. Spears, who isn't exactly what
you'd
call
a
model mother, lost custody of her own kids in her 2nd divorce (and that
was a
Since you have not brought this up, then obviously Mrs. Palin the
younger
obviously does not have the means to support her own breeding habits.
This
is
another issue independent of the whole "moral" issue that would be
paramount
in the Palin family.
very good thing). Thankfully, Spears hasn't killed anyone yet in one of
her
less
than sober escapades. Your question here was a joke, right?
you
had
no
children... there was no way you could make the case you were trying to
make...
Why would someone with children not consider the problem of money?her
less
than sober escapades. Your question here was a joke, right?
Whatever you might think about the drek that Britney has written,
she
at least has some success of her own in gymnastics and music that she
can
claim to her credit. Whatever other trouble she might cause she at
least
has her own means to deal with it. Perhaps in a few years, Mrs. Palin
the
younger might have something equivalent to her credit.
I get it... you're measuring success in dollars and sense. I figuredshe
at least has some success of her own in gymnastics and music that she
can
claim to her credit. Whatever other trouble she might cause she at
least
has her own means to deal with it. Perhaps in a few years, Mrs. Palin
the
younger might have something equivalent to her credit.
you
had
no
children... there was no way you could make the case you were trying to
make...
Children are EXPENSIVE.
unless your name is Snit (who is seen supporting your ridiculous
position;)
On one side we have a flake who is a success in her profession.position;)
On the other side we have a pregnant teenager of fundie parents.
him)
from his discussion with ed about bad parenting;)
--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit