The Climate Debate Is Over, We Must Act Swiftly And Decisively

[BONZ0]

"Climatologists, are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change. ... The
longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality."

Sound Familiar?

This is a 1975 quote from Newsweek about "THE COMING ICE AGE"!!!!!!!

Thank God they did nothing. Imagine how warm we'd be?

Regards

B0NZ0

"...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a
degree panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT meteorology professor and member of the National Academy of Sciences

[Trevor Wilson]

Post by BONZ0
"Climatologists, are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
positive action to compensate for the climatic change. ... The
longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope
with climatic change once the results become grim reality."
Sound Familiar?
This is a 1975 quote from Newsweek about "THE COMING ICE AGE"!!!!!!!
Thank God they did nothing. Imagine how warm we'd be?

**You idiot. Newsweek has not, nor has it ever been a journal of scientific
reference. Try again. You'll find that global warming has been predicted
since the 1970s.

[Dan N]

Post by Trevor Wilson
**You idiot.

You're the idiot. You shouldn't be cross posting this political crap to
most of the groups that you're posting to.

Dan

[Dan N]

And yet you felt the need to make THREE SEPERATE POSTS,

Yes, to three separate people, three different posts. Maybe someone will
finally get the message.

crossposted to
buggery, slagging people (including Trevor, an aus.cars regular) off for
crossposting off-topic nonsense everywhere.

Yes, cross posted to all the groups of the OPs so that everyone will get
the message that off comment, cross posts aren't welcome here.

GET OVER IT!

You get over it.

Dan

[Andy]

Post by Dan N

And yet you felt the need to make THREE SEPERATE POSTS,

Yes, to three separate people, three different posts. Maybe someone will
finally get the message.

You're being way too optimistic there.


Besides, the original poster ("Bonzo") likely doesn't even give half a
shit. He's trolling for replies, to cause a disturbance and piss people
off in the entire aus.* hierachy.


Looks like he succeeded, funnily enough.

Post by Dan N

crossposted to
buggery, slagging people (including Trevor, an aus.cars regular) off for
crossposting off-topic nonsense everywhere.

Yes, cross posted to all the groups of the OPs so that everyone will get
the message that off comment, cross posts aren't welcome here.

Best of luck with that. And welcome to Usenet.


Cheers,
Andy.

[RainbowWarrior]

Post by Dan N

And yet you felt the need to make THREE SEPERATE POSTS,

Yes, to three separate people, three different posts. Maybe someone will
finally get the message.

crossposted to
buggery, slagging people (including Trevor, an aus.cars regular) off for
crossposting off-topic nonsense everywhere.

Yes, cross posted to all the groups of the OPs so that everyone will get
the message that off comment, cross posts aren't welcome here.

GET OVER IT!

You get over it.
Dan

Just get over it.......... :P

[L.A.T.]

Post by Trevor Wilson

Post by BONZ0
"Climatologists, are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
positive action to compensate for the climatic change. ... The
longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope
with climatic change once the results become grim reality."
Sound Familiar?
This is a 1975 quote from Newsweek about "THE COMING ICE AGE"!!!!!!!
Thank God they did nothing. Imagine how warm we'd be?

**You idiot. Newsweek has not, nor has it ever been a journal of
scientific reference. Try again. You'll find that global warming has been
predicted since the 1970s.

TIME magazine, in this week's issue, mentions Svante Arrhenius, a Swedish
chemist, who in the 1890s warned about the effects of pumping carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere. He was awarded a Nobel prize in 1903 for something
unrelated, so he was no simpleton.
So at least one person was predicting global warming long before 1970.

Post by Trevor Wilson
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[BONZ0]

TIME magazine, in this week's issue, mentions Svante Arrhenius, a Swedish chemist, who in the 1890s warned about the effects of
pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. He was awarded a Nobel prize in 1903 for something unrelated, so he was no simpleton.
So at least one person was predicting global warming long before 1970.

Just like many present day eggspurts, he was dead wrong.

The major influences on climate are water vapour and clouds, the variation in global cloud cover being driven by variations in solar
activity, hence resulting in climatic variations.

CO2 is a MINOR PLAYER in climatic variations.

Regards

B0NZ0

"...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a
degree panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT meteorology professor and member of the National Academy of Sciences

[BONZ0]

Post by BONZ0
"Climatologists, are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change. ...
The
longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim
reality."
Sound Familiar?
This is a 1975 quote from Newsweek about "THE COMING ICE AGE"!!!!!!!
Thank God they did nothing. Imagine how warm we'd be?

**You idiot. Newsweek has not, nor has it ever been a journal of scientific reference. Try again. You'll find that global warming
has been predicted since the 1970s.

Sorry to burst your bubble baby, but the CONSENSUS (There's that ugly word again!) amongst eggspurts at the time was of a coming ice
age.

Check your facts.

Newsweek was reporting the CONSENSUS amongst eggspurts!

And this consensus, as on many previous occasions (and most likely on many future occasions), turned out to be DEAD WRONG!

Regards

B0NZ0

"...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a
degree panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT meteorology professor and member of the National Academy of Sciences

[MisterE]

Post by BONZ0
"Climatologists, are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
positive action to compensate for the climatic change. ... The
longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope
with climatic change once the results become grim reality."
Sound Familiar?
This is a 1975 quote from Newsweek about "THE COMING ICE AGE"!!!!!!!
Thank God they did nothing. Imagine how warm we'd be?
Regards
B0NZ0
"...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for anything
except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a
degree panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT meteorology professor and member of the National
Academy of Sciences

What I think is funny about things like the kyoto protocal thing, is that if
everyone followed it, at best its estimate to have a net effect of 0.07
degrees in 2050... meanwhile variation in sun radiation is meant to be as
much as 5 degrees...

[Dan N]

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:26:36 +1000, MisterE wrote:

How can you think yourself qualified to make political comment if you
can't even figure out that that you shouldn't be cross posting to the
majority of groups that you've posted to? aus.computers, aus.cars
etcetera are not interested.

Dan

Post by MisterE

Post by BONZ0
"Climatologists, are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
positive action to compensate for the climatic change. ... The
longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope
with climatic change once the results become grim reality."
Sound Familiar?
This is a 1975 quote from Newsweek about "THE COMING ICE AGE"!!!!!!!
Thank God they did nothing. Imagine how warm we'd be?
Regards
B0NZ0
"...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for anything
except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a
degree panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT meteorology professor and member of the National
Academy of Sciences

What I think is funny about things like the kyoto protocal thing, is that if
everyone followed it, at best its estimate to have a net effect of 0.07
degrees in 2050... meanwhile variation in sun radiation is meant to be as
much as 5 degrees...

[Dan N]

Will the cross posters to this newsgroup fuck off, you're in the wrong
forum, your political views are not welcome in all the groups you've
posted to.

Dan

Post by BONZ0
"Climatologists, are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change. ... The
longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality."
Sound Familiar?
This is a 1975 quote from Newsweek about "THE COMING ICE AGE"!!!!!!!
Thank God they did nothing. Imagine how warm we'd be?
Regards
B0NZ0
"...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a
degree panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT meteorology professor and member of the National Academy of Sciences